"

1 Chapter 1: Media Revolutions and Canadian Society

Amanda Williams

Introduction

The media landscape has undergone profound transformations over centuries, each shift influencing how people communicate and reshaping societies fundamentally (Jenkins, 2006). From the earliest forms of oral tradition to the rise of the digital age, each evolution in media technology has changed human interaction, cultural development, political discourse, and social organization (McLuhan, 1964). This textbook will look at these transformations, focusing on the four major media revolutions—the Print Revolution, the Visual Revolution, the Electronic Revolution, and the Digital Revolution—and their specific implications within the Canadian context while acknowledging global trends and influences.

The concept of media revolutions provides a framework that illuminates how technological innovations have consistently altered how information is created, distributed, and consumed (Kovarik, 2016). These changes have not occurred in isolation but have emerged from and contributed to broader historical, economic, and cultural developments.

Understanding the evolution of media through these “epochs” provides a framework that allows for exploring technological change as both a force and a reflection of societal values (Innis, 2008). The book examines the history of each technology in isolation and with broader historical trends, allowing you to understand how media has influenced the construction of national identity, social movements, and cultural production, particularly in Canada (Vipond, 2011). Furthermore, this approach highlights the reciprocal relationship between media and society: how technological innovations respond to social needs while simultaneously creating new possibilities for human interaction and expression.

As we move through the Digital Revolution, questions about the future of media, its regulation, and its role in shaping Canadian identity are increasingly pressing. The rise of social media platforms, digital storytelling, and artificial intelligence are reshaping communication in ways that echo past technological shifts while presenting challenges unique to the present moment (Flew, 2021). Contemporary issues such as information sovereignty, digital divides, privacy concerns, and algorithmic bias raise important questions about equity, access, and power in the digital age (Noble, 2018). By looking at these revolutions through a historical lens, you will develop a deeper understanding of the interplay between technology, society, and culture and how the media continues to shape the public sphere in Canada and globally (Gasher et al., 2020).

This textbook aims to provide you with theoretical frameworks and practical knowledge about media technologies and their impacts.

 

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:

  • Define the four major media revolutions (Print, Visual, Electronic, and Digital) and their key technological innovations.
  • Explain how media technologies have influenced the construction of Canadian national identity.
  • Describe how Canada’s unique geographical, cultural, and political factors have shaped its media development.
  • Analyze the relationship between media evolution and broader social, cultural, and political societal changes.

Why Study History through Epochs: The Revolution Approach

Studying media history through distinct “epochs” or “revolutions” offers a valuable lens for understanding the major shifts in communication technologies and their societal impacts. Inspired by scholars such as Kovarik (2016), this methodology separates each revolution into phases of significant technological innovations. It emphasizes these changes’ broader social, cultural, and political consequences and highlights the media’s role in forming and maintaining societies (Innis, 2008).

The revolution approach provides several advantages for you of media history. First, it offers a chronological structure that helps organize vast historical information into manageable sections. Rather than presenting media history as a continuous, undifferentiated flow of innovations, the epochal framework identifies key transitional periods when communication practices underwent fundamental transformations (Kovarik, 2016). This allows you to better comprehend the rhythms of technological change and societal adaptation.

Second, this approach encourages a holistic understanding of media developments. By examining each revolution as a complete ecosystem of technologies, practices, and cultural responses, you can appreciate the interconnected nature of media change. For example, the Print Revolution encompassed not only the invention of the printing press but also developments in paper production, literacy education, and book distribution networks. These elements worked together to create new possibilities for knowledge dissemination and cultural expression (Eisenstein, 2005).

By categorizing the history of communication into distinct revolutions, we can identify key shifts in media production, distribution, and consumption that have reshaped society (Kovarik, 2016). For instance, the Print Revolution in the 15th century, marked by the invention of the printing press, democratized access to information and facilitated the spread of knowledge, contributing to modern science and literacy (Eisenstein, 2005). The printing press fundamentally altered the relationship between individuals and information, enabling ideas to circulate more widely and rapidly than ever before. This technological innovation contributed to profound social transformations, including the Protestant Reformation, the scientific revolution, and the rise of nationalism (Anderson, 2006).

Similarly, the Digital Revolution, which began in the late 20th century, has led to the widespread digitization of media, altering everything from politics to personal relationships (Castells, 2010). The development of networked computing has democratized content creation and distribution, challenging traditional gatekeepers and enabling new forms of participation and connectivity (Shirky, 2008). At the same time, it has raised complex questions about privacy, surveillance, and the concentration of power (Zuboff, 2019).

This epochal approach provides clarity and structure, allowing you to grasp the complexity of historical change while connecting different periods of technological innovation (Kovarik, 2016). It emphasizes that each revolution is not merely a technical breakthrough but a catalyst for profound shifts in human behaviour, cultural norms, and governance (Postman, 1992). These periods of change are often marked by tensions—between the old and new, between tradition and innovation—which helps to contextualize ongoing debates about media today (Marvin, 1988). Understanding these historical patterns allows you to better analyze contemporary media developments and anticipate future trends.

Moreover, the revolution framework highlights the non-linear nature of media evolution. Rather than portraying technological change as a straightforward narrative of progress, this approach acknowledges the complex interactions between emerging and established media forms. It recognizes that new technologies do not simply replace older ones but often coexist with and transform them, creating hybrid practices and forms (McLuhan, 1964). This perspective helps you develop a nuanced understanding of media change that avoids technological determinism (giving too much power to technology to control society) while acknowledging the significant impacts of technological innovation.

Specific Issues Relevant to Canada

Canada presents a unique case study when examining the evolution of media technologies. As a country with a history of colonialism and a desire to assert its own identity on the global stage, Canada has long grappled with the challenge of defining its national culture amidst external influences, particularly from the United States (Edwardson, 2008). As a communication tool, the media has played a critical role in reinforcing and challenging national identity (Beaty & Sullivan, 2006).

Several distinctive factors have shaped the Canadian media landscape. Geographically, Canada’s vast territory and dispersed population have historically presented challenges for media distribution and access (Innis, 2008). This geographical reality has influenced media development, from the construction of telegraph lines and radio networks to connect distant communities to current efforts to ensure universal broadband access (Raboy & Shtern, 2010). The country’s proximity to the United States has created a constant tension between cultural sovereignty and economic integration, leading to distinctive regulatory approaches designed to protect and promote Canadian content (Beaty & Sullivan, 2006).

One of the central concerns throughout Canadian media history has been the balance between the global and the local. With the dominance of American media, Canadian content has often struggled to compete in terms of production budgets, distribution networks, and audience reach (Edwardson, 2008). This imbalance has led to persistent concerns about cultural sovereignty and preserving distinctive Canadian voices and perspectives in the media landscape (Lorimer et al., 2012).

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has played a significant role in promoting Canadian content and ensuring that media regulation reflects the country’s cultural priorities (Armstrong, 2016). Through policies such as Canadian content quotas for radio and television broadcasting, financial support for domestic production, and ownership restrictions for media companies, the Canadian government has attempted to create space for local content within a media environment dominated by American imports (Gasher et al., 2020). Yet, as global media powerhouses such as Netflix, YouTube, and Facebook continue to expand their reach, questions about Canadian sovereignty in media production and distribution are becoming more complex (Taylor & Middleton, 2020). The regulatory frameworks developed for traditional broadcasting and telecommunications are increasingly challenged by digital platforms that operate across national boundaries and resist conventional regulatory approaches (Winseck, 2017).

For Indigenous peoples in Canada, media has been both a tool of colonization—spreading stereotypes and erasing Indigenous perspectives—and a means of resistance and cultural reclamation (Roth, 2005). From the earliest print publications to contemporary digital platforms, Indigenous communities have used media to preserve knowledge, challenge dominant narratives, and advocate for self-determination. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s calls to action regarding media representation and Indigenous media development highlight the ongoing importance of these issues in Canadian society (Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2015). More time will be spent addressing this further on in this textbook.

Media have the power to either bridge or widen the gap between these communities, and it is critical to understand the role of media technologies in either reinforcing or challenging historical and ongoing inequalities (Fleras, 2011). The textbook will explore the intersection of media and governance, focusing on the role of public institutions like the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC). It will address contemporary debates around media regulation, censorship, and the rise of social media (Gasher et al., 2020). It will examine how different communities have gained access to media production and distribution and how various media forms have represented (or misrepresented) Canada’s diverse population (Mahtani, 2001).

As Canada navigates the digital age, questions about data sovereignty, algorithmic governance, and platform regulation have become increasingly important (Dubois, 2020). The concentration of ownership in digital media, the collection and use of user data, and the influence of recommendation algorithms on content discovery raise significant issues for Canadian cultural policy and democratic governance (Winseck, 2017). These contemporary challenges echo historical concerns about media ownership, access, and representation while presenting new complexities for policymakers, media producers, and citizens (Taylor & Middleton, 2020).

The Revolutions Explored in This Textbook

The central revolutions explored in this book—the Print Revolution, the Visual Revolution, the Electronic Revolution, and the Digital Revolution—each represent a major turning point in the history of communication. While presented sequentially, it’s important to note that these revolutions overlapped and interacted, creating complex media ecologies rather than discrete historical periods (Briggs & Burke, 2009). Each revolution built upon earlier developments while introducing distinctive technologies, practices, and social impacts.

1. Oral Societies and the Print Revolution

The oral tradition, central to many Indigenous communities, shaped early communication practices through storytelling, ceremonies, and other forms of verbal expression (Archibald, 2008). These traditions transmitted practical knowledge and preserved cultural values, spiritual beliefs, and collective identities across generations. In many Indigenous communities, oral communication practices remain vital cultural resources that complement and sometimes challenge written forms of knowledge.

The invention of the printing press in the 15th century marked a shift to more permanent and wide-reaching forms of communication, leading to mass literacy and the dissemination of information on a scale never before seen (Eisenstein, 2005). This revolution began democratizing knowledge that would continue through the centuries. Johannes Gutenberg’s popularization of movable type printing in Europe around 1440 dramatically reduced the cost and time required to produce books, enabling the mass production of texts for increasingly literate populations (Poe, 2011).

Screw Printing Press in a British Library Hallway
“Screw Printing Press in a British Library Hallway (London, England)” by takomabibelot is marked with CC0 1.0.

The printing press facilitated the standardization of languages, scientific knowledge development, and political ideas (Febvre & Martin, 1976). It transformed education by making textbooks more widely available. It contributed to the rise of the modern nation-state by enabling the circulation of laws, regulations, and narratives of national identity (Anderson, 2006). In Canada, early printing operations were established in the 18th century, primarily serving colonial administrative needs before expanding to include newspapers, religious texts, and eventually a broader range of publications (Fleming et al., 2005).

Newspapers were instrumental in shaping public opinion and facilitating democratic discourse by creating platforms for debate, investigation, and information sharing (Habermas, 1989). The periodic nature of newspaper publishing created a sense of temporality and currency in public discourse, establishing the idea of “news” as a distinctive category of information (Barnhurst & Nerone, 2001).

In Canada, newspapers helped to forge a national identity, particularly concerning British colonial rule, and have continued to serve as a vehicle for shaping the political and cultural landscape (Vipond, 2011). Early Canadian newspapers reflected colonial interests and perspectives but gradually developed to include various voices and viewpoints. The partisan press of the 19th century gave way to more commercialized and professionalized news organizations in the 20th century, although ownership concentration has remained a persistent issue in Canadian print media (Rutherford, 1982).

Regional newspapers played a crucial role in establishing local identities and addressing the specific concerns of different parts of Canada, from the Maritime provinces to the Prairies and the West Coast (Vipond, 2011). French-language newspapers, particularly in Quebec, served as important vehicles for cultural and linguistic preservation. In contrast, newspapers representing various immigrant communities helped maintain connections to countries of origin while facilitating integration into Canadian society (Raboy, 1990).

2. Visual Revolution (Illustrations, Photography, Film and the Design of Information)

These media technologies revolutionized how people viewed and experienced the world by introducing the mechanical reproduction of visual information (Benjamin, 1969). Photography brought visual representation to everyday life, democratizing portraiture and creating new forms of documentation and evidence (Sontag, 1977). It transformed journalism by adding visual elements to news reporting, establishing that seeing is believing and enhancing the emotional impact of information (Newton, 2001).

Black and grey cameras on shelf in a camera store
“Black And Grey Cameras.” Photo by Johannes Plenio: https://www.pexels.com/photo/black-and-grey-cameras-2268843/

Film introduced moving images, creating new forms of storytelling and entertainment that combined visual, narrative, and, eventually, auditory elements (Cook, 2016). It established cinema as both an art form and a mass medium, capable of reaching diverse audiences and transcending literacy barriers. Both photography and film have played complex roles in documenting reality while simultaneously constructing and manipulating it, raising important questions about representation, authenticity, and power (Mirzoeff, 2015).

In Canada, photography and film have been used to document the country’s vast landscapes, diverse populations, and historical developments (Morris, 1992). The National Film Board, established in 1939, has been particularly influential in developing Canadian documentary filmmaking and promoting Canadian perspectives (Druick, 2007). At the same time, Canadian filmmakers have often struggled for visibility within a market dominated by Hollywood productions, leading to various policy interventions to support domestic film production and distribution (Gittings, 2001).

Just as photography and film capture and narrate events visually, data visualization offers a new visual logic, compressing time, scale, and complexity into images that can be read and interpreted (Manovich, 2013). In Canada, visual culture has long been central to state-building and public engagement, from illustrated settlement campaigns to documentary films and interactive data tools.

3. The Electronic Revolution (Telegraph, Telephone, Radio & Television)

These inventions revolutionized communication by enabling the instantaneous transmission of information over long distances, fundamentally altering perceptions of time and space (Carey, 2008). The telegraph, introduced in the mid-19th century, connected previously isolated communities and enabled the rapid transmission of news, business information, and personal messages. It was crucial in expanding railway networks, coordinating business activities, and developing wire services for news distribution (Standage, 1998).

The development of the telephone, in particular, reshaped personal and professional communication, changing how people connected by enabling real-time voice communication regardless of physical distance (Fischer, 1992). Unlike the telegraph, which required specialized operators to encode and decode messages, the telephone was more accessible to ordinary users, making it a truly democratic communication technology. The telephone facilitated intimate personal conversations and efficient business communications, becoming essential in modern life (Marvin, 1988).

Telegraphs and telephones were particularly important in Canada, given the country’s vast geography and dispersed population (Babe, 1990). These technologies helped unite the nation, facilitating governance, commerce, and social connections across enormous distances. The development of telecommunications infrastructure became a national priority, with public and private entities involved in building and maintaining networks. Regulatory approaches to telecommunications have reflected Canadian concerns about universal access, regional equity, and national sovereignty (Babe, 1990).

Radio and television introduced media into people’s homes, offering them a shared experience of entertainment and information that created new forms of collective identity and cultural reference points (Scannell, 1996). Radio broadcasting, which emerged in the early 20th century, created an intimate form of mass communication that could reach listeners in their private spaces while connecting them to a broader public sphere. It established scheduled programming as an organizing feature of media consumption and introduced advertising as a primary funding mechanism for broadcast content (Douglas, 1999).

Grayscale Photo Of Vintage Radio Beside Stove With Cooking Pot
“Grayscale Photo Of Vintage Radio Beside Stove With Cooking Pot.” Photo by Brett Sayles: https://www.pexels.com/photo/grayscale-photo-of-vintage-radio-beside-stove-with-cooking-pot-1213922/

Television extended these developments by adding visual elements, creating an even more immersive and influential medium. Television quickly became the dominant mass medium of the mid-20th century, establishing new genres, celebrities, and viewing practices. Both radio and television have played crucial roles in shaping national cultures while facilitating the globalization of content and formats (Spiegel, 1992).

These technologies played a key role in shaping national identity, especially in Canada, where the government and institutions like the CBC used radio and TV to communicate directly with citizens (Raboy, 1990). The establishment of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in 1936 reflected a deliberate policy choice to ensure Canadian control over broadcasting and to promote Canadian content in the face of American influence. The CBC’s mandate to inform, enlighten, and entertain Canadians while contributing to shared national consciousness exemplifies the perceived importance of broadcasting in national identity formation (Raboy, 1990).

Canadian broadcasting policy has consistently sought to balance commercial viability with public service objectives, leading to a mixed system of public and private broadcasters operating within a regulatory framework designed to ensure Canadian content and ownership (Armstrong, 2016). The challenges of serving linguistically divided audiences and geographically dispersed communities have shaped distinctive Canadian broadcasting approaches (Raboy & Shtern, 2010).

4.  The Digital Revolution (Computers, the Internet, and Social Media)

The Digital Revolution, beginning in the mid-20th century, has transformed how people communicate and interact by introducing networked computing as a fundamental communication infrastructure (Castells, 2010). The development of personal computers in the 1970s and 1980s democratized access to computing power, enabling new forms of content creation and information management. The rise of the Internet in the 1990s established a global communication network that transcended traditional barriers of geography, institutional control, and media format (Abbate, 1999).

Macintosh plus all-in-one computer sitting on a wooden desk
“Macintosh Plus” by raneko is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

The internet and social media platforms have democratized media production and distribution while presenting new challenges in privacy, regulation, and social interaction (van Dijck, 2013). The development of the World Wide Web created a more accessible interface for Internet communication, leading to rapid adoption and the development of new services and platforms. Social media emerged in the early 21st century as a distinctive form of digital communication, emphasizing user-generated content, social networking, and algorithmic content curation (boyd & Ellison, 2007).

Digital technologies have facilitated media convergence, blurring traditional boundaries between print, broadcast, and interpersonal communication (Jenkins, 2006). They have enabled new forms of participation and collaboration while raising concerns about surveillance, misinformation, and the concentration of power in platform economies (Zuboff, 2019). The shift from broadcast to narrowcast media distribution models has fragmented audiences while enabling more personalized content experiences (Napoli, 2011).

In Canada, the Digital Revolution has presented both opportunities and challenges. Digital technologies have enabled smaller markets and niche content producers to reach audiences more effectively, potentially enhancing cultural diversity and expression (Taylor & Middleton, 2020). At the same time, global digital platforms have disrupted traditional Canadian media business models and regulatory approaches, raising concerns about the future of Canadian content production and distribution (Winseck, 2017). Rural connectivity, digital literacy, and equitable access remain significant in the Canadian context, reflecting the country’s ongoing challenge of serving diverse populations across vast territories (Raboy & Shtern, 2010).

This book will explore these revolutions in detail, emphasizing their implications for Canadian society and culture. The book will highlight how these technologies have shaped public discourse, national identity, and cultural production, with particular attention to their relationship to power, governance, and resistance issues. By examining these revolutions in their historical contexts while connecting them to contemporary developments, you will develop a nuanced understanding of the media’s role in Canadian society and its potential future trajectories.

Summary

This textbook will explore significant technological advancements in media history, focusing on how each innovation has reshaped communication and society. Each chapter tackles one or two key technologies, examining their impact on communication practices and societal structures. The Canadian context adds a unique layer of complexity, highlighting how the country’s cultural diversity and history have influenced media development. By integrating theoretical perspectives with historical analysis, the textbook encourages critical thinking about the media’s role in shaping identity, power dynamics, and social change, particularly within Canada’s diverse media landscape.

 

Key Takeaways

Key takeaways from this chapter include:

  •  Media technologies have transformed communication, identity formation, and democratic participation. Each new media form has reshaped the relationship between creators, distributors, and audiences, with significant cultural, economic, and political impacts.
  • Print, Visual, Electronic, and Digital revolutions marked pivotal shifts in communication practices, deeply influencing societal contexts.
  • The media in Canada has been central to shaping national identity, balancing cultural sovereignty with global media influences and developing distinctive policies to protect Canadian voices.
  • Canada’s hybrid media governance model blends market mechanisms with public service goals, reflecting values of linguistic diversity, cultural expression, and universal access.
  • Digital technologies, especially social media, have disrupted traditional communication and regulation, enabling new participation and content creation. Understanding these changes requires an awareness of historical media evolution.

 

In conclusion, this textbook aims to provide valuable insights into the evolution of media technologies, offering both historical understanding and critical perspectives on their societal impacts. By exploring the relationship between media and power, especially in the Canadian context, you will develop the skills to analyze the media’s role in shaping social, cultural, and political life. Understanding these historical patterns equips you to engage with the current and future media environment, shaping informed discussions and contributing to the ongoing development of media in Canada and beyond.

References

Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the internet. MIT Press.

Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). Verso.

Archibald, J. (2008). Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. UBC Press.

Armstrong, R. (2016). Broadcasting policy in Canada (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.

Babe, R. E. (1990). Telecommunications in Canada: Technology, industry, and government. University of Toronto Press.

Barnhurst, K. G., & Nerone, J. (2001). The form of news: A history. Guilford Press.

Beaty, B., & Sullivan, R. (2006). Canadian television today. University of Calgary Press.

Benjamin, W. (1969). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 217-251). Schocken Books.

boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

Briggs, A., & Burke, P. (2009). A social history of the media: From Gutenberg to the internet (3rd ed.). Polity.

Carey, J. W. (2008). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society (Rev. ed.). Routledge.

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Cook, D. A. (2016). A history of narrative film (5th ed.). W. W. Norton.

Douglas, S. J. (1999). Listening in: Radio and the American imagination. Times Books.

Druick, Z. (2007). Projecting Canada: Government policy and documentary film at the National Film Board. McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Dubois, E. (2020). Canadian digital media policy in an age of algorithm control. Centre for International Governance Innovation.

Edwardson, R. (2008). Canadian content: Culture and the quest for nationhood. University of Toronto Press.

Eisenstein, E. L. (2005). The printing revolution in early modern Europe (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Febvre, L., & Martin, H. J. (1976). The coming of the book: The impact of printing 1450-1800. NLB.

Fischer, C. S. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. University of California Press.

Fleming, P. L., Gallichan, G., & Lamonde, Y. (Eds.). (2005). History of the book in Canada. University of Toronto Press.

Fleras, A. (2011). The media gaze: Representations of diversities in Canada. UBC Press.

Flew, T. (2022). Regulating platforms: The challenge of digital disruption. Polity.

Gasher, M., Skinner, D., & Coulter, N. (2020). Mass communication in Canada (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Gittings, C. E. (2001). Canadian national cinema: Ideology, difference and representation. Routledge.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.

Innis, H. A. (2008). The bias of communication (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

Kovarik, B. (2016). Revolutions in communication: Media history from Gutenberg to the digital age (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.

Lorimer, R., Gasher, M., & Skinner, D. (2012). Mass communication in Canada (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Mahtani, M. (2001). Representing minorities: Canadian media and minority identities. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 33(3), 99-133.

Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. Oxford University Press.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.

Mirzoeff, N. (2015). How to see the world. Pelican.

Morris, E. (1992). Faces of Canada: Building a postcolonial nation through the National Photography Collection. McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. Columbia University Press.

Newton, J. H. (2001). The burden of visual truth: The role of photojournalism in mediating reality. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.

Poe, M. T. (2011). A history of communications: Media and society from the evolution of speech to the internet. Cambridge University Press.

Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Knopf.

Raboy, M. (1990). Missed opportunities: The story of Canada’s broadcasting policy. McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Raboy, M., & Shtern, J. (2010). Media divides: Communication rights and the right to communicate in Canada. UBC Press.

Roth, L. (2005). Something new in the air: The story of First Peoples television broadcasting in Canada. McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Rutherford, P. (1982). A Victorian authority: The daily press in late nineteenth-century Canada. University of Toronto Press.

Scannell, P. (1996). Radio, television and modern life: A phenomenological approach. Blackwell.

Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. Penguin Press.

Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Spiegel, L. (1992). Make room for TV: Television and the family ideal in postwar America. University of Chicago Press.

Standage, T. (1998). The Victorian Internet: The remarkable story of the telegraph and the nineteenth century’s on-line pioneers. Walker Books.

Taylor, G., & Middleton, C. (2020). Digital divides and digital rights in Canada. UBC Press.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to action. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.

van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.

Vipond, M. (2011). The mass media in Canada (4th ed.). James Lorimer & Company.

Winseck, D. (2017). The geopolitical economy of the global internet infrastructure. Journal of Information Policy, 7, 228-267.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Media Attributions

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Media History in Canada Copyright © 2025 by Amanda Williams; Kyle Napier; and Milena Radzikowska is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.