"

Fern gametophytes in varying densities

3. Preparing for Lab Session 2 of the Fern Lab – Finding a Relevant Research Article

The primary question that we are asking in the fern lab is: “Does gametophyte density affect sex expression in Ceratopteris richardii gametophytes?” (this is the question you are focusing on in your lab assignment)

In the discussion portion of the lab assignment, you will be comparing your results to 1 peer-reviewed research article (fast-forward – you will have data on the percent of gametophytes that are male or hermaphroditic at different densities). Use the instructions below to locate and summarize the article. But first, what is the difference between a review article and a research article (briefly)?

  • A research article (i.e., primary source) reports their own, original research. These articles have the typical structure of a scientific article (i.e., abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion).
  • A review article (i.e., secondary source or literature review) synthesizes and evaluates previous primary research articles. These types of articles provide an overview of the progress related to a particular topic. The end of a review article outlines areas where there are gaps in the current knowledge of that topic (i.e., next steps). The structure of a review article is different from a typical scientific article and resembles more of an essay format.
Procedure – Finding a Relevant Research Article

a) To get started, it is a good idea to come up with a list of key terms to use for searching in the databases. Recall that the research question from above. See the “Searching for Journal Articles on a Topic” section earlier in this manual for guidance as needed. In your lab notebook, make a table that looks something like the one below and fill it in – this will help you to be intentional about your search!

Example of what this could look like

I am interested in gathering information on the effect of environmental temperature on thermoregulation patterns in bats. I could look at the question statement and see that there are 3 different “concepts” within it that are my 3 key terms (alternatively, think of it as breaking the statement into IV, DV, and study organism)

EXAMPLE Concept 1 (i.e., IV) Concept 2 (i.e., DV) Concept 3 (i.e., study organism)
Key term Temperature Thermoregulation Bats
Related Term(s) Environmental temperature; climate Thermoregulation patterns; temperature regulation; torpor [a specific pattern] Chiroptera [bat family]

b) Once you have the key terms listed, make a list in your lab notebook of the combinations that can be used in the database using ‘AND’ (i.e., concept 1 AND concept 2). See the “Searching for journal articles on a topic” in the Library Resources.

c) Go to the “Augustana Subject Guides” section University of Alberta Library website and select “Biology”. There are 6 different databases that are recommended for Biology (listed under “Articles – Biology”). In AUBIO 112, the most helpful databases will be the top 3: BIOSIS Citation Index, Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus.

d) Try a few of your key term combinations in BIOSIS Citation Index (or another database). If your search is too broad or not coming up with anything relevant, try using more (or less) specific terms.

e) Once you find some promising articles, read the abstracts of a few (i.e., 2-3), and decide if the promising articles are 1) peer-reviewed, 2) research articles and 3) relevant to the fern lab:

1) Is the article peer-reviewed? To determine whether a journal has a peer review process, search for the journal title in Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory and look for the little “refereed” symbol:. You can find Ulrich’s in the “Biology Subject Guide” under “Peer Reviewed Journals” section.

2) Is it a research article? Look for “original research” or “research article” somewhere at the top of the article. Sometimes the articles aren’t labelled, but you can use some clues from the abstract and structure of the article to determine if it is a research article:

      • Does the objective/purpose/question relate directly to an experiment that was performed? If yes, then it is a research article.
      • Are there key words like “An experiment was undertaken…”? If yes, then it is a research article.
      • If you look at the methods section, does the information provided indicate compiling articles, or undertaking a literature review? If yes, then this is NOT a research article.
      • Does the structure of the article look like an essay (i.e., not the typical introduction > methods > results > discussion format [whether there are headings or not…]? If it looks like an essay, then it is likely NOT a research article.

3) How do you know if the article is relevant? The article should address a similar question to the one posed in this experiment. The model organism does not have to be Ceratopteris richardii (but it should be a plant species [ferns are plants!])

f) Select a relevant article and read it (see the “Guidelines” below for help with reading the article). While you are reading the relevant article (note: if it turn out to not be relevant, go back and find a new one!), provide point-form answers to the following questions in your lab notebook – be sure to paraphrase rather than copying:

    • What is the research question?
    • What is the model organism (i.e., species)?
    • In 1-2 sentences how did they carry out the experiment?
    • What are the major findings and conclusion from the study?
    • Why is this source relevant to the fern lab?

Guidelines for reading the article

  • For tips on reading articles, see the “Reading Scientific Papers” section in the “Essential Resources” document (if you haven’t already!)
  • Reading methods: the methods section can be very technical! You want to read it at a very superficial level. For example, what is the study organism, what GENERAL method are they using for setting up their experiment/study and how/when did they collect data. You don’t need to look at how they analyzed the data (skip this part entirely!)
  • Reading results: There are often a lot of statistics shown in a results section, but typically before it gets into the statistics, there is a description about the major findings. Only read the major findings and skip over the statistics! Hopefully there is a figure that shows the results as well – if so, look at the figures. Something that will be helpful for you in the results section is having a basic understanding of p-values:
    • A p-value for our purposes is essentially the probability that the means are different due to random chance rather than that there is a real difference between the two samples. We use a threshold of 0.05 in biology – this value indicates that something is not due to chance is if it happens less than 5% of the time (e.g., in 19 times out of 20 survivor pill-bugs will run faster than victims, or only 1 victim pill-bug ran faster than the survivors).
      • If p>0.05, then we fail to reject the null hypothesis (we conclude that there is no significant difference between groups). Note that even if there are not significant differences between groups, we are not saying the two groups are the same.
      • If p<0.05, then we reject null hypothesis (we conclude that our data support there being a significant difference between groups – remember though we can never PROVE it is true).