16 Innovative Pedagogical Strategies Using ePortfolios for Creative Teaching and Learning
Lytion Chiromo, Reformed Church University, Zimbabwe
Cathrine Kazunga, Bindura University of Science Education, Zimbabwe
ABSTRACT
In the dynamic landscape of education, the integration of technology into the classroom has significantly reshaped how students learn, collaborate, and demonstrate their growth. One of the most transformative tools that has emerged in recent years is the ePortfolio, a digital collection of artifacts that showcases students’ learning processes, reflections, achievements, and skills over time. ePortfolios offer a platform for students to engage in deep, reflective learning and actively participate in their educational journey. This chapter explores creative and innovative pedagogical strategies for incorporating ePortfolios into teaching and learning, ultimately aiming to foster self-directed learning, critical thinking, and personalised education. The chapter used qualitative methods using the case of a public university in Zimbabwe. The data was elicited through document analysis and structured interviews from eight participants. The findings revealed that traditional ePortfolios are often individual endeavours, but collaborative ePortfolios take this concept further by encouraging peer collaboration, critique, and co-creation. These ePortfolios allow students to document joint projects, share ideas, and offer constructive feedback to one another. The collaborative nature of these ePortfolios promotes teamwork and communication skills, both of which are essential in modern education and professional settings.
Keywords: ePortfolio, Innovative Pedagogical Strategies, collaborative ePortfolios, Creative Teaching and Learning
INTRODUCTION
The integration of digital tools into educational practice has transformed traditional pedagogical paradigms, prompting a shift toward more student-centred, reflective, and collaborative learning environments. Among the innovations gaining traction in this digital age is the ePortfolio, which serves not merely as a repository of academic work but as a dynamic space for reflection, creativity, and the demonstration of learning over time (Barrett, 2007). During COVID-19, most students did not have access to face-to-face learning, relying solely on online learning. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly accelerated the adoption and integration of digital technologies in education, including the use of ePortfolios. ePortfolios, digital collections of student work that showcase learning progress, achievements, and reflections, gained prominence during remote learning as tools to support personalised, reflective, and flexible learning experiences. With schools and universities transitioning to online instruction, educators turned to ePortfolios as an alternative method for assessment and engagement. Unlike traditional exams, ePortfolios allowed students to demonstrate learning outcomes in diverse formats, including videos, blogs, presentations, and multimedia artifacts (Trust & Whalen, 2021). Students curated their own content and learned at their own pace. ePortfolios encouraged deeper student reflection during a period marked by isolation and disconnection. By documenting their learning process, students developed metacognitive skills and took greater ownership of their academic progress (Cheng & Chau, 2021). This implied that ePortfolios helped students enhance digital literacy and communication skills. During COVID-19, educators used ePortfolios to implement formative and summative assessments that were more continuous and less reliant on high-stakes testing. This was especially important in disciplines like art, design, education, and nursing, where practical demonstration is critical (Rowley & Munday, 2022). Thus, students fostered a sense of community through peer and instructor feedback. ePortfolios empower learners to take ownership of their educational journey, enabling them to curate evidence of their growth, engage in self-assessment, and articulate their learning processes in meaningful ways (Tosh et al., 2005).
In the context of this study, the term “ePortfolio” (electronic portfolio) refers to a digitally curated collection of a learner’s work and reflections, designed to demonstrate progress, achievement, and evidence of learning over time. (Weber, Cai & Elliston, 2023). Therefore, an ePortfolio is viewed as a product of all the activities carried out in an educational session. These activities are filed using electronic folders to come with an ePortfolio. Unlike traditional paper-based portfolios, ePortfolios leverage digital tools and platforms, allowing for multimedia integration, ongoing feedback, and easy sharing with instructors, peers, and potential employers. An ePortfolio is not merely a repository of student work, but rather a pedagogical tool that supports formative and summative assessment, promotes metacognitive thinking, and enables personalised learning pathways. It empowers learners to document their learning journeys, reflect critically on their experiences, and connect academic content with real-world skills (Butakor, 2024). During the COVID-19 pandemic, ePortfolios gained increased relevance as educators and institutions sought alternative modes of assessment that were flexible, accessible, and student-centred (Cheng & Chau, 2021). In this study, the ePortfolio is conceptualised as both a process and a product , a dynamic, evolving space where learners construct knowledge through digital means while also producing a tangible outcome for academic and professional use.
This chapter explores creative and innovative pedagogical strategies for incorporating ePortfolios into teaching and learning, ultimately aiming to foster self-directed learning, critical thinking, and personalise deduction. Grounded in a qualitative case study approach, it highlights how ePortfolios can transcend their traditional, individual-focused role to foster collaboration, co-construction of knowledge, and peer feedback. As collaborative ePortfolios gain prominence, they are increasingly recognised for their potential to enhance 21st-century competencies such as teamwork, digital communication, and critical thinking (Buzzetto-More, 2010). This exploration provides insight into how ePortfolios, when used creatively, support transformative learning and reflect broader shifts in pedagogical thinking. Accordingly, the research question that is addressed in this study is, “What are creative and innovative pedagogical strategies for incorporating ePortfolios into teaching and learning?”
LITERATURE REVIEW
The evolving demands of 21st-century education have necessitated pedagogical approaches that are learner-centred, technology-integrated, and competency-driven. In this context, ePortfolios have emerged as versatile tools for documenting student learning, promoting reflective practice, and supporting creative and collaborative pedagogies (Barrett, 2007; Zubizarreta, 2009). Initially introduced as digital collections of student work, ePortfolios have since evolved into dynamic learning spaces that encourage critical thinking, self-directed learning, and personalise deduction (Chau & Cheng, 2010).
ePortfolios as Reflective Learning Tools
One of the most significant pedagogical advantages of ePortfolios lies in their ability to foster reflection. According to Moon (2004), reflection is central to deep learning, enabling students to critically evaluate their experiences, integrate new knowledge, and make informed decisions. ePortfolios provide structured opportunities for such reflection, often through narrative entries, multimedia artifacts, and iterative feedback. Barrett (2007) argues that reflection through ePortfolios enhances metacognition and helps students become more intentional learners. Research by Tosh et al. (2005) further supports the idea that students who engage in reflective ePortfolio practices show greater awareness of their academic and professional development.
Promoting Creativity and Ownership
ePortfolios also serve as platforms for creative expression, allowing students to showcase their learning in diverse and personalised ways. Unlike standardised tests, ePortfolios support multiple modes of representation, including videos, graphics, blog posts, and interactive media, which are particularly effective in arts, design, and humanities education (Yancey, 2009). This flexibility encourages students to take ownership of their learning, align artifacts with their interests, and demonstrate growth across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains (Buzzetto-More, 2010).
Collaboration and Peer Learning
While traditionally individual in nature, collaborative ePortfolios are gaining recognition as tools that foster peer interaction, critique, and shared learning. Collaborative ePortfolios allow students to co-create content, comment on each other’s work, and engage in peer assessment, which not only improves the quality of outputs but also builds communication and teamwork skills (Chen, 2010). According to Klenowski, Askew, and Carnell (2006), such interactions encourage the social construction of knowledge and deepen students’ understanding through dialogue. The shift from individual to collaborative ePortfolio models aligns with social constructivist learning theories, which emphasise the importance of co-learning and distributed cognition (Vygotsky, 1978).
ePortfolios and 21st-Century Skills
ePortfolio pedagogy also aligns with the broader goal of developing 21st-century competencies, including digital literacy, critical thinking, adaptability, and self-regulation. Lorenzo and Ittelson (2005) highlight that ePortfolios support lifelong learning by allowing students to continuously update and curate their learning narratives. In teacher education, in particular, portfolios have been used to assess professional competencies and support practicum reflection, and track readiness for the field (Zeichner & Wray, 2001). As such, ePortfolios act as bridges between academic learning and professional practice.
Challenges and Considerations
Despite their advantages, the effective implementation of ePortfolios requires careful planning. Studies highlight common challenges, including lack of training, inconsistent feedback mechanisms, and technological limitations (Buzzetto-More, 2010; Hallam & Creagh, 2010). For ePortfolios to be transformative, educators must be equipped with the necessary skills, and institutional support must be in place. Furthermore, clear rubrics and expectations must guide student engagement to ensure that creativity and collaboration do not compromise academic rigour (Abrami & Barrett, 2005).
The literature consistently supports the use of ePortfolios as tools for enhancing creative teaching and learning. The use of ePortfolios provides a flexible, reflective, and learner-driven space that supports both individual and collaborative pedagogical strategies. However, their success depends largely on thoughtful integration into curricula, sustained support for users, and alignment with assessment standards. Future research should explore context-specific strategies for maximising the collaborative and creative potential of ePortfolios, particularly in diverse educational environments.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
This chapter is grounded in three interrelated educational theories: constructivism, experiential learning theory, and the 21st-Century Learning Framework, which collectively provide a foundation for understanding how ePortfolios can facilitate innovative and creative teaching and learning practices.
These three educational theories—constructivism, experiential learning theory, and the 21st-Century Learning Framework—were used because they complement one another by promoting learner-centred, reflective, and skills-oriented education. Constructivism suggests that learners build knowledge actively through interaction with their environment and reflective engagement (Piaget, 1972; Vygotsky, 1978). This aligned closely with Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning theory, which emphasised a cyclical process of concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation, and active experimentation. ePortfolios support both approaches by allowing students to document their real-world learning experiences, reflect on their progress, and demonstrate growth over time. The 21st-Century Learning Framework (Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 2009) complements these theories by highlighting essential skills such as critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and digital literacy skills that are nurtured through the reflective and integrative process of building and curating ePortfolios. Together, these frameworks provide a strong pedagogical foundation for using ePortfolios to support innovative, authentic, and future-oriented teaching and learning.
Constructivism
Constructivist theory posits that learners actively construct knowledge through interaction with their environment, experiences, and social context. Vygotsky’s (1978) sociocultural constructivism emphasises the role of social interaction and collaboration in cognitive development, particularly through the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), the space where learning is scaffolded through guided support.
In the context of this chapter, ePortfolios function as learning spaces (Modise & Mudau, 2021) where students co-construct knowledge, reflect on experiences, and engage in peer feedback and collaboration to gain knowledge and skills that students need to function in the changing digital age. These digital platforms support dialogic learning, enabling learners to express individual perspectives while learning from others, thereby reinforcing shared meaning-making.
Experiential Learning Theory
Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) highlights the importance of learning through experience, reflection, conceptualisation, and experimentation. According to Kolb, effective learning occurs when individuals cycle through four stages:
- Concrete Experience
- Reflective Observation
- Abstract Conceptualisation
- Active Experimentation
ePortfolios align with this model by allowing learners to:
- Document concrete experiences (e.g., lesson plans, projects),
- Engage in reflective observation through written reflections,
- Analyse their learning (abstract conceptualisation),
- Set future goals or revise practice (active experimentation).
Through iterative engagement with ePortfolios, students internalise this cycle, supporting deep, continuous learning and personal development.
21st-Century Learning Framework
This chapter is also informed by the 21st-Century Learning Design (21CLD) framework (Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 2009), which outlines essential skills such as collaboration, self-regulation, creativity, and digital literacy. ePortfolios, when integrated innovatively, promote these skills by:
- Encouraging autonomous learning and time management,
- Facilitating creative expression through multimedia formats,
- Supporting digital competence in navigating and curating online platforms.
As such, ePortfolios are not merely assessment tools but are transformative pedagogical instruments that align with global educational priorities.
By situating this study within constructivist, experiential, and 21st-century learning theories, it becomes evident that ePortfolios serve as rich, multi-dimensional learning tools. They support learners in constructing knowledge, reflecting on their development, engaging collaboratively, and preparing for real-world professional and academic challenges. These theoretical lenses provide a robust foundation for interpreting explored creative and innovative pedagogical strategies for incorporating ePortfolios into teaching and learning, ultimately aiming to foster self-directed learning, critical thinking, and personalised education.
METHODOLOGY
This chapter employed a qualitative research design to explore creative and innovative pedagogical strategies for incorporating ePortfolios into teaching and learning, ultimately aiming to foster self-directed learning, critical thinking, and personalised education. The qualitative approach was deemed appropriate as it allows for in-depth understanding of participants’ experiences, perceptions, and practices within a specific educational context (Creswell, & Poth, 2022)
Research Design
This study adopted a case study research design to explore creative and innovative pedagogical strategies for incorporating ePortfolios into teaching and learning, ultimately aiming to foster self-directed learning, critical thinking, and personalised education at a public university in Zimbabwe (Yin 2018). A case study research design was chosen because it allows for in-depth exploration of participants’ lived experiences, perceptions, and practices within their real-world contexts (Creswell & Poth, 2023; Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). The case study method, as defined by Yin (2018), is especially appropriate when investigating contemporary phenomena in real-life settings, where the boundaries between context and the phenomenon are not clearly evident.
Research Setting and Participants
The research was conducted at a public university in Zimbabwe, selected for its active implementation of ePortfolio practices in teacher education. A purposive sampling strategy was employed to recruit eight participants who had direct experience with using ePortfolios either as student teachers or supervising lecturers. This sample included five student teachers (three female, two male) in their final year of study and three lecturers involved in assessing and supervising teaching practice through the use of ePortfolios. Purposive sampling was appropriate for this study because it ensures that participants are information-rich and capable of providing insights relevant to the research questions (Patton, 2015).
Data Collection Methods
The data were generated through document analysis (ePortfolios) and structured interviews to elicit data from 8 selected participants. For the sake of anonymity, the participants were coded using tags ‘S1’, ‘S2’ , ‘S3’, ‘S4’, and ‘S5’, where the order did not have any significance; thus, the responses could not be linked in publications to the original participants, while enabling an organisation of the data for the five students and ‘L1’, ‘L2’, and ‘L3’ for the lecturers. The study began with the document analysis of students’ ePortfolios. These ePortfolios included schemes of work, lesson plans, video recordings of classroom practice, self-reflections, peer feedback, assessment rubrics, and supervisor comments. These documents will enable us to explore creative and innovative pedagogical strategies for incorporating ePortfolios into teaching and learning. Document analysis was conducted using a thematic framework to identify patterns related to collaboration, reflection, critical thinking, and professional development. Document analysis enabled the researcher to access authentic, naturally occurring data and observe how students represented their learning (Bowen, 2009).
Structured interviews were conducted with all eight participants to gain deeper insight into the creative and innovative pedagogical strategies used in the incorporation of ePortfolios into teaching and learning during teaching practice. The incorporation of ePortfolios into teaching and learning was a powerful way to promote reflection, showcase student growth, and support competency-based education. The interviews followed a predetermined guide that included both open-ended and probing questions designed to explore the creative and innovative pedagogical value of ePortfolios, the shift from individual to collaborative practices, challenges faced during implementation, and reflections on learning and professional growth. Each interview lasted approximately 10–30 minutes and was audio-recorded with the participants’ consent. The recordings were transcribed verbatim for analysis.
Data Analysis
Data from both document analysis and interviews were subjected to thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase approach, which are familiarisation with the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the report. Themes were developed inductively, allowing patterns to emerge from the data rather than imposing preconceived categories. To enhance trustworthiness, member checking was used; participants were invited to review the interpretations of their statements to ensure accuracy and authenticity.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical clearance was obtained from the university’s research ethics board prior to data collection. All participants provided informed consent, and confidentiality was assured by using pseudonyms and securely storing data. Participants were also informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty.
FINDINGS
The analysis of structured interviews and document analysis evidence yielded four major themes that highlight exploration of creative and innovative pedagogical strategies for incorporating ePortfolios into teaching and learning, ultimately aiming to foster self-directed learning, critical thinking, and personalised education. There are several themes that emerged in the study; these are:
Digital portfolios with multimedia integration
The researchers observed that the five students whose ePortfolios were analyzed indicated that the students were encouraged to build ePortfolios using tools like Google Sites, integrating videos of lesson presentations, audio reflections, animations, and journal entries. This promoted creativity and digital literacy. The interview data buttresses that one of S1 states :
“Before, I just completed tasks to meet deadlines. With the ePortfolio, I reflect on what I’ve learned and how I can use it in real-life teaching situations.” S1
From the interviews conducted, lecturers supported this by indicating that the reflective elements of the ePortfolio helped students develop a habit of self-evaluation and goal setting key components of lifelong learning.
ePortfolios provided students with opportunities to express creativity through multimedia elements such as videos, infographics, blogs, and recorded lessons. Analysis of portfolio artifacts showed students experimenting with different formats to demonstrate their learning. This not only enhanced digital literacy but also encouraged innovation in how students represented their knowledge and competencies.
Lecturers praised this as a shift away from conventional, text-heavy assessments:
“I saw students who struggled with academic writing thrive when given the chance to use visuals, audio, or other creative tools to express understanding.”
Storytelling and Narrative-Based Portfolios
The students made the learning and teaching process meaningful and human-centred. The students were guided to craft their portfolios as a personal learning journey. The student used narrative writing to reflect on challenges and growth. The ePortfolios add mentor and peer feedback as part of storytelling. From the document analysis of ePortfolio, it was revealed that students frequently connected course content to their personal and professional development, fostering a deeper understanding of learning goals. The five participants’ ePortfolios contained some information of self-reflection done by the students and by their peers. Therefore, storytelling and narrative-based ePortfolios were part of the innovation used as a pedagogical strategy for incorporating ePortfolios.
Gamification Pedagogical Strategy
The ePortfolio development was turned into a game experience. The idea of assignments and final reflections and presentations made the whole exercise of incorporating ePortfolios a game. The use of peer review epitomized the idea of teamwork or learning teams. The gamification was an innovation that increased motivation and engagement. Gamification was a pedagogical strategy used as a form of creativity and innovation.
Reflection and Self-Directed Learning
Participants consistently emphasised the reflective nature of ePortfolio tasks. Both students and lecturers reported that regular reflection entries prompted learners to think critically about their learning processes, strengths, and areas for improvement
The Collaborative Portfolio Pedagogical Strategy
The data revealed a distinct shift in how students and lecturers perceive the role of ePortfolios from traditional, individualistic documentation to more dynamic, collaborative spaces for learning. While early uses of ePortfolios focused on personal reflection and individual progress tracking, many participants acknowledged the transformative potential of collaborative ePortfolio models, particularly when structured around group tasks, shared reflections, and peer feedback. The collaborative portfolios strategy promoted group portfolios for collaborative projects. The teams contribute entries in the ePortfolios so as to showcase individual roles in the development of the ePortfolios. The collaborative pedagogical strategy includes the elements of peer evaluations and group reflections. This encouraged teamwork and accountability. The ePortfolio was a collaborative product by a community of learners.
Traditional ePortfolios as Individual Endeavours
Most participants reflected that in earlier stages of their teacher training, ePortfolio work was largely a solo activity, driven by individual reflection and assessment requirements.
“At first, it felt like something I just had to do on my own, like a digital folder of my assignments and lesson plans,” said S1.
“You upload your work, write a reflection, and move on. There wasn’t much interaction with anyone else,” added S3.
Lecturers also echoed this observation, noting that ePortfolios were often perceived as compliance tools rather than active learning environments.
“Students were focused on ticking boxes and uploading evidence for each competency but not necessarily engaging in critical dialogue about their practice,” remarked L2.
Collaborative ePortfolios: A Shift Toward Co-creation and Peer Engagement
However, when the ePortfolio exhibition strategy was implemented, it fostered confidence and communication skills. The collaborative models and portfolio exhibition strategy used there were group reflections, shared teaching projects, and structured peer feedback; students reported a richer and more meaningful learning experience.
“Working on the portfolio with my peers made me think more deeply about my own teaching. Seeing their reflections helped me rethink my own,” said S5.
Collaborative ePortfolios encouraged dialogue and mutual learning, transforming the platform from a static archive into a shared learning space.
“Instead of just reflecting alone, we were reflecting together. We questioned each other’s approaches and gave suggestions; it became more interactive,” explained S2.
Lecturers observed that the collaborative ePortfolio supported critical thinking, teamwork, and communication skills aligned with both teacher education goals and 21st-century competencies.
“I noticed that when students were required to comment on each other’s portfolios or co-create lessons, their insights were more critical and detailed. It moved beyond surface-level reflection,” noted L1.
The Cross-Disciplinary Integration Pedagogical Strategy
The students’ teachers used portfolios to connect learning across subjects. The creation of ePortfolios revealed an interplay of subjects’ knowledge integrated to come up with the ePortfolios. A student was supposed to have subject content knowledge, for example, specialized mathematics content knowledge. In order to come up with an ePortfolio, one has to incorporate the knowledge of computers (computer literacy), drama and theatre, and art. Thus the students used the integration pedagogical strategy, an innovation related to the use of ePortfolios in education. From the observation, ePortfolios for Participants S2, S3, and S4 revealed that the students integrated technology and secretarial studies. The observation data indicated that the students had well-typed lesson plans (S2, S3, & S4). However, the knowledge of technology was a challenge. The data from the study indicated that the teaching practice video showed part of the class (S2); the participant S2 did not attach the TP video, and Participant 4 attached two unrelated videos. The student teacher was a science student teacher but attached another teacher’s video on plant cells and the other on nutrients with another teacher. Lastly, the S4 ePortfolio revealed that the pictures were not clear because of some interruptions with the person recording the video. The participants used cross-disciplinary integration as a pedagogical strategy, but technological incompetency was the challenge that militated against the full success of the creativity and innovation in the use of ePortfolios.
Benefits of Collaborative ePortfolio
The collaborative use of ePortfolios also supported professional identity development and fostered a stronger sense of community among pre-service teachers.
“It felt less isolating. We were all learning from each other, and that made the experience more motivating,” commented S4.
This shift also mirrored real-world professional practices, where collaboration, feedback, and co-planning are essential.
“Teaching is not done in isolation. So what should teacher training be? Collaborative ePortfolios reflect how we work in schools with teams, with feedback, and with shared goals,” stated L3.
Challenges in Implementation
Despite the benefits, participants also highlighted several challenges. These included limited technical skills among both students and some staff, insufficient time for portfolio development, and inconsistent feedback from lecturers. Some students found the initial learning curve steep, especially when using unfamiliar ePortfolio platforms. Additionally, lecturers noted that providing meaningful feedback within the ePortfolio environment was time-consuming and required additional support.
“We see the value, but without institutional backing and training, it becomes difficult to implement at scale,” commented L1.
The findings reveal that when used innovatively, ePortfolios can transform teaching and learning by promoting reflection, collaboration, and creativity. However, successful implementation requires targeted support, digital literacy training, and institutional commitment. The next section (Discussion) will further interpret these findings in relation to existing literature and pedagogical theories.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study suggest a meaningful pedagogical shift in how ePortfolios are used in teacher education from static, individual repositories to collaborative, interactive learning tools. This shift aligns with evolving educational priorities that emphasise authentic learning, peer interaction, and 21st-century skills. Furthermore, participants’ experiences reflect a growing shift in higher education toward student-centred, reflective, and collaborative learning environments, aligning closely with constructivist and experiential learning theories (Kolb, 1984; Vygotsky, 1978).
Reflection and Self-Directed Learning
One of the strongest findings was the role of ePortfolios in cultivating reflection and self-directed learning. This supports Barrett’s (2007) and Moon’s (2004) assertion that reflection is critical for deep learning and metacognitive development. Students’ ability to connect academic content to their personal and professional growth indicates that ePortfolios function as developmental tools, promoting autonomy and accountability. The repeated engagement in self-assessment helped learners internalize learning goals, which is foundational to lifelong learning, a key objective in 21st-century education (OECD, 2018).
Collaboration and Peer Engagement pedagogical strategy
The emergence of collaborative ePortfolios in this study extends existing literature that traditionally emphasises ePortfolios as individual reflective tools. Research by Chen (2010) and Klenowski et al. (2006) has argued for the value of social learning within portfolio development. The collaborative approach allowed students to co-construct knowledge, give and receive feedback, and develop interpersonal competencies. These findings suggest a move toward more participatory and socially constructed forms of learning that echo Vygotsky’s (1978) emphasis on the importance of dialogue and interaction in cognitive development.
Traditional ePortfolios: Individual Reflection and Evidence Collection
Initially, participants experienced ePortfolios as individualised tools used primarily for documentation and assessment purposes. As several student teachers noted, the early use of ePortfolios often resembled a checklist activity, with limited opportunities for dialogic engagement. This aligns with Tosh et al. (2005), who argue that students often perceive ePortfolios as compliance-driven, focused more on fulfilling course requirements than on deepening learning. Furthermore, the isolated nature of traditional ePortfolios limits their potential to foster social learning. According to Boud, Keogh, and Walker (1985), while personal reflection is critical for meaning-making, it becomes more powerful when situated within a social or collaborative context. Without interaction, reflections may remain superficial and lack critical analysis.
Collaborative ePortfolios: Peer Learning and Co-construction of Knowledge
When collaborative elements were introduced, such as group reflections, peer reviews, and co-created teaching artifacts, participants reported greater engagement, improved reflective quality, and stronger professional learning. This supports the notion that collaborative learning environments enhance cognitive and metacognitive development (Vygotsky, 1978; Lave & Wenger, 1991). Yang et al. (2016) highlight that collaborative ePortfolio use not only promotes higher-order thinking skills but also encourages shared responsibility for learning. In this study, both students and lecturers observed that collaboration led to deeper insights, as peers challenged each other’s ideas and offered alternative perspectives. This type of learning resonates with constructivist and experiential theories, which emphasise learning through social interaction and real-world practice (Kolb, 1984; Jonassen, 1999). Moreover, the collaborative ePortfolio model aligns with the 21st Century Learning Framework, which advocates for skills such as communication, teamwork, and digital literacy (Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 2009). By engaging in co-construction of knowledge and providing peer feedback, student teachers developed competencies that are essential for professional collaboration in modern classrooms.
IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHER EDUCATION
The shift toward collaborative ePortfolio practices has several implications for teacher education programs. Firstly, it calls for intentional design of learning activities that foster peer interaction and critical engagement not just personal reflection. Secondly, both student teachers and lecturers require training and support to effectively use collaborative tools and strategies. As noted by Garrett (2011), without adequate scaffolding, students may struggle to move beyond descriptive entries into truly reflective and analytical practice. Additionally, the findings highlight the need to reconceptualise assessment practices, ensuring that peer and collaborative contributions are valued within formal evaluation frameworks. This would reflect a more holistic understanding of professional development that includes dialogue, feedback, and teamwork, key elements of effective teaching.
Creativity and Digital Literacy
The ability of students to creatively curate and present learning artifacts through multimedia formats aligns with Yancey’s (2009) vision of ePortfolios as spaces for creative expression and digital fluency. Students who might struggle with conventional academic writing found alternative modes to demonstrate understanding and competence, thus reinforcing the principle of differentiated instruction (Tomlinson, 2001). Moreover, engaging with digital tools promoted critical 21st-century skills such as digital communication, visual literacy, and technological adaptability (Lorenzo & Ittelson, 2005).
Implementation Challenges
Despite the clear pedagogical benefits, the study revealed practical challenges, including technical limitations, time constraints, and inconsistent feedback findings echoed in prior studies (Buzzetto-More, 2010; Hallam & Creagh, 2010). These challenges highlight a gap between pedagogical aspirations and infrastructural realities. Successful integration of ePortfolios requires not only educator buy-in and student readiness but also institutional support, including training, policy frameworks, and adequate digital infrastructure.
Implications for Teaching and Learning
The findings of this study have several important implications. Firstly, teacher training programs must integrate ePortfolio pedagogy not just as an assessment tool, but as a reflective and collaborative learning strategy. Secondly, curriculum designers should embed ePortfolio tasks in ways that encourage creativity, critical reflection, and teamwork. Lastly, institutions must invest in platforms that are accessible, intuitive, and supported by professional development.
This study confirms that ePortfolios, when used innovatively, serve as catalysts for transformative learning. They promote student agency, creativity, and collaboration key qualities for thriving in the knowledge economy. However, to fully realize their potential, systemic support is essential. Future research should explore scalable models for collaborative ePortfolio integration and investigate their long-term impact on learner identity and academic success. Storytelling and narrative-based ePortfolios were part of the innovation used as a pedagogical strategy for incorporating ePortfolios. In addition, gamification was a pedagogical strategy used as a form of creativity and innovation.
CONCLUSION
This chapter has explored the creative and innovative pedagogical strategies for incorporating ePortfolios in teacher education, particularly within the context of a public university in Zimbabwe. The findings reveal that while traditional ePortfolios have primarily been used as individual tools for documenting learning and reflection, the emergence of collaborative ePortfolio practices represents a significant pedagogical advancement. By integrating features such as peer feedback, shared reflections, and group projects, collaborative ePortfolios move beyond passive documentation toward active, dialogic, and socially situated learning. The study demonstrates that collaborative ePortfolios support not only critical thinking and self-regulation, but also foster essential 21st-century competencies such as communication, teamwork, and digital literacy. Students reported deeper engagement and more meaningful reflection when given opportunities to interact with peers within the ePortfolio environment. Lecturers, too, noted an improvement in the quality of reflection and professional identity development over time, particularly when collaboration was embedded in the design of ePortfolio tasks. These findings suggest several implications for teacher education programs. First, intentional design and scaffolding are necessary to ensure that collaboration is meaningful and not superficial. Second, institutions should provide adequate training and technological support to both staff and students to fully leverage the pedagogical potential of ePortfolios. Finally, assessment models must evolve to recognise and value collaborative processes and peer assessment contributions as integral to professional growth.
In an increasingly digital and interconnected educational landscape, ePortfolios, especially collaborative ones, offer a promising pathway for cultivating reflective, competent, and collaborative educators who are prepared for the demands of 21st-century classrooms.
This chapter has also demonstrated that ePortfolios, when applied through innovative pedagogical strategies, have the potential to transform teaching and learning in higher education. By fostering reflective practice, promoting creativity, and encouraging collaboration, ePortfolios move beyond traditional assessment methods to support holistic student development. The findings revealed that students not only engaged more deeply with course content but also developed critical 21st-century skills, including digital literacy, teamwork, and self-directed learning. The integration of collaborative ePortfolios represents a significant shift from individualistic learning approaches toward more interactive, dialogic, and participatory models. This aligns with constructivist and experiential learning theories, which emphasise the importance of learning as a social, reflective, and active process. However, for such innovation to be effective, institutional support is essential, particularly in areas of digital infrastructure, professional development, and consistent feedback mechanisms. Ultimately, ePortfolios offer a dynamic platform for both educators and learners to engage in meaningful, creative, and transformative educational experiences. As higher education continues to adapt to the digital age, ePortfolios provide a valuable tool to bridge theory and practice, personalise learning, and prepare students for lifelong learning and professional growth. Thus, storytelling and narrative based ePortfolios were part of the innovation used as a pedagogical strategy for incorporating ePortfolios. Gamification was a pedagogical strategy used as a form of creativity and innovation.
REFERENCES
Abrami, P. C., & Barrett, H. (2005). Directions for research and development on electronic portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3).
Barrett, H. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436–449.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. RoutledgeFalmer.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Butakor, Paul. (2024). Use of ePortfolios as a Teaching, Learning and Assessment Tool in Higher Education: Differing Opinions among Ghanaian Pre-Service Teachers and Nurses. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy. 5. 35-45. 10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.6.858.
Buzzetto-More, N. A. (2010). Assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of an ePortfolio used for summative assessment. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6, 61–85.
Chau, J., & Cheng, G. (2010). Towards understanding the potential of ePortfolios for independent learning: A qualitative study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 932–950.
Chen, H. L. (2010). Documenting learning with ePortfolios: A guide for college instructors. Wiley.
Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2021). Exploring the role of ePortfolios in reflective thinking during the COVID-19 pandemic: A student perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 100804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100804
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hallam, G., & Creagh, T. (2010). ePortfolios: Research and practice in higher education. Australian Flexible Learning Framework.
Garrett, N. (2011). An ePortfolio design supporting ownership, social learning, and ease of use. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 187–202.
Klenowski, V., Askew, S., & Carnell, E. (2006). Portfolios for learning, assessment and professional development in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 267–286.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 215–239. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of ePortfolios. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey‑Bass
Modise, M.E & Mudau, P.K.(2021) Using ePortfolios for meaningsful teaching and learning in distance education in developing countries : A systemic Review.
Moon, J. A. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. Routledge.
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009). A Framework for Twenty-First Century Learning. http://www.p21.org/
Tosh, D., Light, T. P., Fleming, K., & Haywood, J. (2005). Engagement with electronic portfolios: Challenges from the student perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3).
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2021). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 29(2), 189–199.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yancey, K. B. (2009). Electronic portfolios a decade into the 21st century: What we know, what we need to know. Peer Review, 11(1), 28–32.
Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. P. (2016). The role of ePortfolios in supporting productive learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1276–1286.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Zeichner, K., & Wray, S. (2001). The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: What we know and what we need to know. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(5), 613–621.
Zubizarreta, J. (2009). The learning portfolio: Reflective practice for improving student learning (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Rowley, J., & Munday, J. (2022). An arts‑based learning model: Synergies of artist mentorship, ePortfolio and discovering ‘possible self’. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.55146/ajie.2022.30
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.
AUTHORS
Dr. Lytion Chiromo is a Dean of Students at Reformed Church University. He holds a Ph.D. in Restorative Justice from the University of KwaZulu-Natal, a Master of Arts, a Bachelor of Arts Special Honours, a Bachelor of Arts General, a Diploma in Adult and Continuing Education, and a Diploma in Education. He possesses a strong administrative and academic background. He has vast experience in the teaching of mathematics at the primary and tertiary levels. He also has vast experience in teaching and training teachers, with experience in primary, secondary, and tertiary education. With a strong research focus, he authored articles and published papers in reputable journals. His expertise spans areas in the teaching and learning of STEM education. As a dedicated educator, he inspires students with their passion for mathematics, fostering a love for learning and academic excellence.
Email: mahunzuhunzul@gmail.com
Dr. Cathrine Kazunga is a Mathematics Education expert with a strong academic background and professional experience. She holds a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Mathematics Education from the University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, a Master of Education in Science (Mathematics), and a Bachelor of Education in Mathematics (HBScEd) from Bindura University of Science Education. She has vast experience in teaching and training teachers and experience in primary, secondary, and tertiary mathematics. Her research interests are the teaching and learning of linear algebra, STEM education, ICT integration into mathematics teaching and curriculum interpretation, and classroom mathematics. She has the following awards from Bindura University of Science Education: best student and Vice Chancellor award (2008) and Organisation of Women in Science for the Developing World (OWSD) Postgraduate Training Fellowships for Women Scientists in Sub-Saharan Africa and Least Developed Countries (2013). She had several publications and presented her work to different conferences nationally, regionally, and internationally.
Email: kathytembo@gmail.com
